Saturday, March 15, 2025, 8:45 PM
BREAKING NEWS
**The talks between the Russian and US delegations in Saudi Arabia have begun. **The two sides are meeting in Saudi Arabia for their most extensive discussions in years **Russia says its priority is to begin normalising relations with the US. **Russia says its priority is to begin normalising relations with the US.
Saturday, March 15, 2025, 8:45 PM
Home » US firm agrees to buy Panama Canal ports

US firm agrees to buy Panama Canal ports

It said that it would sell its interests as part of a deal worth $22.8bn (£17.8bn).

by NWMNewsDesk
0 comment

A Hong Kong-based company has agreed to sell most of its stake in two key ports on the Panama Canal to a group led by US investment firm BlackRock.

The sale comes after weeks of complaining by President Donald Trump that the canal is under Chinese control and that the US should take control of the major shipping route.

Through a subsidiary, CK Hutchison Holding operates ports at the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific Ocean entrances to the canal.

banner

It said that it would sell its interests as part of a deal worth $22.8bn (£17.8bn).

CK Hutchison, founded by Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing, is not owned by the Chinese government. But its base in Hong Kong means it operates under Chinese financial laws. It has operated the ports since 1997.

The deal includes a total of 43 ports in 23 countries around the world, including the two canal terminals. It will require approval by the Panamanian government.

The 51-mile (82km) Panama Canal cuts across the central American nation and is the main link between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.

Up to 14,000 ships travel through it each year, including container ships carrying cars, natural gas and other goods, and military vessels.

It was built in the early 1900s. The US maintained control over the canal zone until 1977, when treaties gradually ceded the land back to Panama.

After a period of joint control, Panama took sole control in 1999.

Trump has made several arguments for retaking control of the canal and the surrounding area. He argued that Chinese influence is a national security threat, that the US investment in the initial building of the canal justifies taking back control, and that US ships are charged too much for using the waterway.

You may also like

Blogs

Latest Articles

© 2024 News World Media. All Rights Reserved.