Friday, September 20, 2024, 4:44 PM
BREAKING NEWS
**Donald Trump guilty on all counts in historic criminal trial. **Former President has been found guilty on all 34 counts in his New York criminal hush money trial. **The Republican candidate has denied wrongdoing and an attorney representing him said they would file appeal. **The first-ever criminal trial of an American president. **Case centered on allegations about falsifying business records. **Trial lasted for over six weeks presumptive presidential nominee. **Trump first former president to be convicted in US history. **The trial lasted for over six weeks against the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.
Friday, September 20, 2024, 4:44 PM
Home » Hong Kong court affirms landmark sedition conviction for pro-democracy activist

Hong Kong court affirms landmark sedition conviction for pro-democracy activist

Tam was convicted on 11 charges in 2022, including seven counts of “uttering seditious words.”

by NWMNewsDesk
0 comment

Criticizing laws or 0 can be enough to jail someone for sedition in Hong Kong, an appeal court ruled Thursday in a landmark case brought under a colonial-era law increasingly used to crush dissent.

Hong Kong’s Court of Appeal upheld a 40-month sentence for pro-democracy activist Tam Tak-chi, the first person tried under the city’s sedition law since Hong Kong returned to Chinese rule in 1997.

Tam’s lawyers had argued his conviction should be overturned because the prosecution did not show he meant to incite violence.

The prosecution is widely seen as part of Beijing’s clampdown on dissent in the former British colony, following widespread anti-government protests in 2019.

banner

Tam was convicted on 11 charges in 2022, including seven counts of “uttering seditious words.” A judge at the lower court took issue with him chanting the popular protest slogan “Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times” — words the government says imply separatism — and criticizing the Beijing-imposed National Security Law during a primary campaign.

The judge said his words broke the law because they incited discontent against Hong Kong and disobedience to the law.

You may also like

Blogs

Latest Articles

© 2024 News World Media. All Rights Reserved.