Former prime minister of Pakistan and PTI founder Imran Khan, currently incarcerated, has dismissed allegations of being a proponent of establishing relations with Israel, accusing detractors of twisting the narrative based on a recent Israeli newspaper article.
Khan, who is facing several legal battles while in detention, addressed the media at Adiala Jail on Monday, labeling the claims as part of a “propaganda campaign.”
“Since yesterday, there has been a propaganda blitz, citing an Israeli newspaper that I am the biggest advocate for relations with Israel,” Khan said. “These claims are absurd. The article did mention me, but clearly, some people do not understand English.”
The article in question, published by The Jerusalem Post, discussed Khan’s influence in the Muslim world and the West, speculating on the potential impact he or a similar leader could have on Pakistan’s foreign policy, particularly about Israel.
However, Khan was quick to clarify that his position on Israel remains firmly pro-Palestinian.
“My stance on Israel has not changed. The Palestinian people are enduring genocide.
Any discussions with Israel are contingent upon a ceasefire and a genuine commitment to a two-state solution,” Khan asserted. He accused his political opponents of misinterpreting the article to undermine his credibility.
Khan’s remarks come against the backdrop of a volatile political environment in Pakistan.
Responding to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent appeal for unity and cooperation to steer the country towards development, Khan offered a sharp rebuke. “Shehbaz Sharif, listen carefully: peace is a by-product of justice,” Khan declared.
“The elections were blatantly rigged, PTI workers were thrown in jail after the May 9 events, and yet no serious investigations are underway. Without justice, there can be no peace.”
Khan also aimed to propose constitutional amendments, warning that they would further erode peace and stability. He accused the chief justice and chief election commissioner of overstepping their roles, likening them to “umpires who are also opening batsmen,” suggesting that the judiciary and election authorities are not impartial.
